Navigation

2012-11-13 — rctlj.org

``In its discussion, the court maintained that MERS lacked the authority to assign the consolidation agreement to the bank because it never possessed the promissory note--that is, it never had a security interest in the mortgage.[9] As such, the bank did not have standing to commence a foreclosure action against the Silverberg's.''

go to full article | permalink to this | forum thread | | RSS | Subscribe by email!



Comments: Be the first to add a comment

add a comment | go to forum thread